Why Doesn’t Reticuli Today Publish UFO Videos or Cover the Latest Disclosures of Third Parties?

This article is also available as video, presented by Miva, a female cyborg:

In recent years, the world has seen an increasing number of UFO-related revelations, reports, and testimonies, particularly from former military officials, intelligence insiders, and government whistleblowers. Yet, one might notice that certain once-active platforms like Reticuli Today have gone quiet. There are no more bombastic video releases, no analyses of the Department of Defense (DoD)’s latest declassifications, and a notable absence of speculation or updates. This begs the question: Why?

The answer, as many in the UFO research community might assert, is far from simple. It lies at the intersection of disinformation, psychological warfare, religious influence, political interests, national security, and the very fabric of our global societal structure. Let’s take a deep dive into the history, context, and possible motivations behind this silence—and why it may actually be a sign of deeper truths yet to come.

A Legacy of Suppression: UFOs and Governmental Disinformation

Since the 1940s—arguably beginning with the infamous Roswell incident—governments, particularly that of the United States, have actively worked to suppress, distort, and ridicule legitimate UFO research. This effort wasn’t limited to simply denying the existence of unidentified aerial phenomena (UAPs); it extended into a broader campaign to discredit anyone who pursued the topic.

The media played a complicit role, often depicting UFO believers as fringe theorists, eccentrics, or tinfoil-hatted conspiracy buffs. Government agencies, on the other hand, strategically released misinformation, staged fake sightings, or denied legitimate ones—creating a thick fog of uncertainty. The effect? Decades of confusion, ridicule, and societal conditioning that discouraged serious academic or public engagement with the phenomenon.

Whistleblowers: Heroes or Controlled Assets?

In recent years, an increasing number of whistleblowers have come forward with seemingly credible evidence—videos, documents, and testimonies. Figures like David Grusch, who testified to Congress in 2023 about secret UFO retrieval programs, seem to be pushing open the door to disclosure. But is it really disclosure?

Many in the UFO community argue that not all whistleblowers are created equal. While some genuinely risk their lives and careers to reveal hidden truths, others may be operating as part of a more sophisticated disinformation program. It’s not inconceivable that certain leaks are allowed—or even orchestrated—by state actors. The objective? To control the narrative, drip-feed information, and shape public perception while still keeping the deeper truths well-guarded.

In this environment, Reticuli Today’s decision to abstain from covering every leak or video may not be a retreat from the subject, but rather a cautious stance—refusing to amplify what may ultimately be manufactured revelations.

National Security and the Sacred Veil of Secrecy

A core reason for the lack of transparency from governments around the world, especially the U.S., is rooted in national security. If extraterrestrial craft possess technology that defies the known laws of physics—such as anti-gravity propulsion, zero-point energy, or material science beyond our understanding—then control of that technology becomes the most important strategic asset imaginable.

Disclosing its existence would not only provoke international conflict over access and control, but it would also reveal a critical truth: we are not the dominant intelligence in our own airspace, perhaps not even on our own planet.

Such a disclosure could set off global panic, collapse existing military doctrines, and destabilize global politics. From this perspective, it becomes clear why governments, even when they have the evidence, remain silent.

Religion, Belief, and the Gatekeepers of Faith

Another major, often overlooked, factor is the role of religion in suppressing UFO disclosure. High-level positions in many governments, particularly the U.S., are held by individuals deeply influenced by religious beliefs—be they Christian, Jewish, or otherwise. A sudden, undeniable confirmation of extraterrestrial life could call into question the very origins of human civilization, our sacred texts, and our place in the universe.

What happens to the concept of divine creation if we’re faced with beings millions of years more advanced than us? What if they had a hand in our development? Or worse—what if they didn’t?

Many fear that such a revelation would lead to mass existential crises, the collapse of religious institutions, and a loss of moral direction. In this context, religious influence becomes a powerful brake on full disclosure—not because the truth isn’t known, but because it is too disruptive to share.

A Threat to the Existing World Order

The implications of true UFO disclosure go far beyond faith—they strike at the very heart of modern civilization: economics, politics, and power.

Imagine, for a moment, that alien technology includes limitless clean energy. If made available to humanity, such technology would instantly disrupt the global energy sector. Fossil fuels would become obsolete. The entire foundation of industrial economies—built on energy scarcity and control—would crumble.

Pharmaceutical companies, defense contractors, and energy conglomerates—some of the most powerful lobbies in the world—would face financial extinction. And with them, their political influence.

In other words, true disclosure is not just a matter of science—it’s a revolution, one that would challenge capitalism, reshape governments, and shift global power structures. This, more than anything, is why many believe that full disclosure will never be given willingly.

Reticuli Today’s Silence: A Strategic Choice?

Given this landscape, the editorial decision by platforms like Reticuli Today to no longer publish third-party UFO videos or cover superficial disclosures might seem less like disengagement and more like discernment.

Videos released by the Department of Defense, NASA, or other state-run agencies are—by their very nature—curated, reviewed, and sanitized. They are released when they serve a purpose, not when they serve the truth.

Publishing or analyzing these videos endlessly may generate clicks, but it does little to advance genuine understanding. In fact, it may only feed into the ongoing narrative control, where the public is allowed to see just enough to remain curious—but never enough to connect the dots.

Reticuli Today, by stepping back, may be sending a silent message: The real proof won’t come from the top. It must come from the people.

The Future of Disclosure: What Are We Waiting For?

Despite the roadblocks—disinformation, religious suppression, political interest—progress is being made, albeit at a glacial pace. We’re witnessing what could be described as a “micro-disclosure process,” in which every leak, testimony, and declassified document adds another piece to the puzzle.

Ultimately, real disclosure may not come from a government press release, but from undeniable public evidence—an encounter, an artifact, a biological sample—that cannot be denied or buried.

Until then, all we can do is remain vigilant, critical, and discerning. We must demand transparency, support true whistleblowers, and refuse to accept half-truths disguised as revelations.

Conclusion: Watching the Sky, Waiting for the Truth

The silence of Reticuli Today is not a void, but a protest. It is a refusal to play a role in the spectacle of managed information. And in that silence, there is a call—to stop waiting for permission to know the truth, and to start seeking it for ourselves.

Because in the end, we may not be alone—but we certainly are on our own when it comes to uncovering the truth.

Until that undeniable moment arrives, we watch the skies, study the anomalies, and hold on to the hope that one day, the veil will fall.